PENELOPE (“PENNY”) E. NICHOLSON

Partner
Tel: 713-357-5159
Fax: 713.357.5160
pnicholson@sohjlaw.com Download vCard Download Bio

Penny’s practice focuses on matters relating to appeals in civil cases, including issues that arise at the trial court level (such as matters relating to jury instructions, jury questions, and dispositive motions), and including mandamus actions and amicus briefs. She has handled and participated in the appeal of numerous cases in various federal and state courts, including appellate proceedings in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits and in the U.S. Supreme Court as well as in the Supreme Court of Texas, in intermediate Texas appellate courts, and in various other state appellate courts. As reflected in the following list of representative matters, the appellate matters that Penny has handled and participated in have included cases involving significant legal issues and many millions of dollars in damages. Penny has been board certified in the area of Civil Appellate Law since 1990.

Before joining Schiffer Odom Hicks & Johnson PLLC as a partner, Penny was a partner at the law firm of Vinson & Elkins and practiced law there for 30 years. Penny participated in the founding of the Vinson & Elkins Appellate Section in 1990. Prior to 1990, her practice focused on commercial litigation, including first and second chair trial experience, taking depositions, and handling various other discovery and pretrial matters.

REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS:

REPRESENTATIVE CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS:

  • Won reversal and rendition of a bad faith judgment against an insurance company; the court established the legal rule that an insurer does not owe an insured a duty of good faith while a case is pending on appeal
  • Won reversal of a multi-million dollar judgment against two individuals and two closely held corporations in a commercial dispute involving a business venture; the court held that a ratification theory could not be used to circumvent Texas alter ego law
  • Won reversal of a so-called “agreed judgment” of $2 million against a restaurant based on a personal injury claim; the restaurant had withdrawn its consent to a settlement after learning that the plaintiff, who had testified that she was confined to a wheelchair, could in fact walk without assistance; the case involved important legal principles concerning the rendition of judgment
  • Won reversal of a $30 million judgment based on a breach of warranty claim; the case involved novel questions of UCC law that were certified to the Minnesota Supreme Court
  • Won reversal of a court of appeals decision holding that a trial court cannot set aside an order granting a new trial; the Texas Supreme Court held that during the time that a trial court has plenary jurisdiction, the trial court has the power to set aside a prior order granting a new trial
  • Won, in the Supreme Court of Texas and then on remand to the San Antonio Court of Appeals, reversal of a multi-million dollar default judgment entered against a defendant as a death penalty sanction
  • Obtained mandamus relief requiring the dismissal of a lawsuit involving a car accident that occurred in Mexico brought by a Texas next friend on forum non conveniens grounds; the case resolved important issues relating to the construction of the Texas forum non conveniens statute

OTHER MATTERS:

  • Has handled the preparation of jury instructions and questions as well as the preparation of objections to jury instructions and questions in numerous cases (including mass tort litigation) in various courts
  • Has handled numerous motions for summary judgment and other dispositive motions in various courts

REPRESENTATIVE CASES IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS OF APPEALS AND DISTRICT COURTS:

  • Obtained, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, reduction of a judgment in a commercial dispute from $50 million to $10 million and then won, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, reversal and rendition of the remaining $10 million judgment; the case involved important legal principles relating to application of the judicial estoppel doctrine in the bankruptcy context
  • Won, in the Dallas Court of Appeals, reversal and rendition of a $15 million judgment in an asbestos case; the case involved significant duty issues, and the trial court’s judgment was reversed on the ground that the defendant did not owe the plaintiff a duty with respect to second-hand asbestos exposure from asbestos fibers allegedly brought home on the clothes of the plaintiff’s former husband
  • Won, in the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals, reversal of a multi-million dollar judgment against a national magazine publishing company in a dispute between the company and one of its licensees, and then won, again in the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals, affirmance of the judgment rendered in favor of the magazine publishing company following retrial
  • Won, in the Beaumont Court of Appeals, reversal of a $100 million judgment against a worldwide engineering, procurement, and construction management company, and won reversal and rendition of a $70 million judgment entered against one of the company’s engineers, in a commercial dispute involving claims of tortious interference and defamation
  • Won, in the Beaumont Court of Appeals, reversal and rendition of a $79 million judgment in an oil and gas case involving a dispute over minerals and claims of fraud and breach of the duty of good faith
  • Won, in the First Court of Appeals in Houston, affirmance of a take-nothing judgment entered against a plaintiff in a wrongful death action seeking millions of dollars in damages based upon the alleged defective design of a life jacket
  • Won, in the Fort Worth Court of Appeals, a writ of mandamus against a trial court that had ordered an airline to produce materials that the airline considered to be trade secrets

HONORS/AWARDS/RECOGNITIONS/PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:

Martindale Hubbell AV Rated
Listed in Texas Super Lawyers
Listed in The Best Lawyers in America
Board Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in the area of Civil Appellate Law
Member of the Texas State Bar Oversight Committee on Pattern Jury Charges, 2007-2013
Authored and presented “Appellate Practice in Texas State Courts,” University of Houston Advanced Civil Litigation, 1993 – 1997, 1999
Speaker for various teaching seminars sponsored by the State Bar of Texas, the University of Houston, South Texas College of Law, and the Louisiana Attorney General’s Office

PRACTICE AREAS:

Appeals
Appellate-related work at the trial court level

EDUCATION:

University of Texas School of Law, J.D. cum laude, 1980 (Order of the Coif; Texas Law Review)
Yale University, B.A., Russian and East European Studies, summa cum laude, 1977 (Phi Beta Kappa)

BAR ADMISSIONS:

Texas

COURT ADMISSIONS:

United States Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Domestic & International Reach

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

SOHJ U.S. Offices

Houston:

700 Louisiana, Suite 2650

Houston, TX 77002

Tel: 713.357.5150

Fax: 713.357.5160

Map & Directions
Seattle:

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4200

Seattle, Washington 98104

Tel: 206.262.7677

Fax: 206.262.8001

Map & Directions

Houston:

700 Louisiana, Suite 2650

Houston, TX 77002

Tel: 713.357.5150

Fax: 713.357.5160

Seattle:

701 Fifth Avenue

Suite 4200

Seattle, Washington 98104

Tel: 206.262.7677

Fax: 206.262.8001

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.